> "dvaoa" <dv...@altavista.com> wrote in message
>
> news:8e843807-a41b-43e8-9577-493ecc4500ce@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Jul 7, 8:00 pm, "ythread" <ythr...@att.net> wrote:
> >> "dvaoa" <dv...@altavista.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:d3d5cb64-3ff0-4d5e-a143-055ad7841ff9@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> > (had guests from out of town with us, so I didn't get a chance to put
> >> > it through the ringer yet...take this review with a grain of salt).
>
> >> > Picked up the guitar last Thursday:
>
> >> >http://store.guitarfetish.com/xvsoashtrrof.html
>
> >> > I know, how can I get a tele-style guitar without a maple
> >> > fingerboard...truth is, I can't stand maple fingerboards. Don't like
> >> > how they look or feel. I've always been a rosewood/ebony guy.
>
>
> >> > Grade: B
> >> > The guitar looks and feels very nice. Mine came a little darker, more
> >> > "woody" than "honey", and the grain on mine is definitely more
> >> > pronounced. I like that. It makes it look gritter, for what it's
> >> > worth.
>
> >> > Pros:
> >> > -The neck (my main concern on any guitar), is very nice. The
> >> > fingerboard is smooth, and all the frets checked out for evenness with
> >> > my fret checker. The frets could use a polishing/buffing, but are
> >> > playable as is. No fret ends sticking out. Able to do nice deep
> >> > bends very easily.
> >> > -Nice graphite nut, smooth nut slots (see Cons)
> >> > -Very good fit/finish/construction, doesn't look/feel *noticeably*
> >> > inferior to a Fender Strat. Purists may differ. I'm not a purist.
> >> > -Bridge pickup: I'm guessing they plunked in their standard GFS Tele
> >> > pup set (alnicos), but the bridge pup was a revelation to me; it does
> >> > SC tele pops & quacks nicely, but it overdrives and distorts as well
> >> > when pushed without getting muddy. Very articulate but ballsy.
>
> >> > Cons:
> >> > -G string buzzes up & down the entire fretboard when you dig in; when
> >> > you look at the nut, the G slot is visibly cut too deep. The nut will
> >> > have to be replaced.
> >> > -The tone control is a little on the useless side; highs roll off only
> >> > at the very end. Basically, either on or off. But neither the volume
> >> > or tone pots are scratchy.
> >> > -The neck could use a little tilt backwards; while the nut is cut nice
> >> > & low (the way I like it, G-slot notwithstanding), action around the
> >> > upper frets is a little too high for my taste. Not by much.
>
> >> > Sound:
> >> > Can't really comment too much yet because I haven't really spent too
> >> > much time with it. Like I mentioned above, the bridge pup can do
> >> > country to metal (yup...) without breaking a sweat. I haven't noticed
> >> > a lot of noise (out of the ordinary) or microphonics yet. The neck
> >> > pup's output is noticeably lower than the bridge pup. The sound
> >> > is...what you'd expect from a tele lipstick neck pup.
>
> >> > Overall, mine's well worth the $170, from what I can tell. After I
> >> > replace the nut & shim the neck, I suspect it'll be a gem.
>
>
> >> yep..sounds like you got a $170 guitar.
>
> > Oooo...I'm gonna be out another $40 for the nut...or $10 if I do it
> > myself.
>
> > What will I do with all the cash I didn't spend on a Fender logo?
>
> > Maybe I can write you a personal check for the gear snob illumination?
>
> > -d (pffft...)
>
> here ya go dude.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loWrI1FneSM
>
> that movie changed my whole perspective on life.
>
> "I feel pretty. Oh so pretty!" :-)